>Before you ban me or lock the thread, you should consider the
>fact that some significant JFK research has been accomplished
>on this thread.
>
>Unger seems to be admitting now that the disputed Lovelady
>clip is NOT from Martin. Read what he wrote.
>
>Do you realize what it means? It means that the one and only
>image of Lovelady wearing the plaid shirt is now of dubious
>origin.
>
>Some unknown person went to Dealey Plaza and shot a 6 second
>film. That's all he shot because if he shot more there would
>be more. And if he shot more separately it would exist
>separately and be of the same photographic quality. But, there
>is no other such clip.
>
>Plus, the action of the clip is strange, with the Oswald-esque
>character going in and the others fussing over him. (I know it
>wasn't really Oswald)
>
>But now we have opened up a whole new line of questioning
>about this mysterious six second movie, and hopefully, it is
>just the beginning. And I hope you feel it has been
>worthwhile.

Ralph,

The only reason you are still posting is that I do encourage general discussion, even of theories that are unpopular or generally considered bazaar. It generates discussion, and allows people to re-think what they believe, if for no other reason than to reword it to explain something. Robin may have found out he was mistaken about it being the Martin film, as we all make mistakes. The rest of his questions were probably more of challenges and a genuine request for information.

But the overall topic of this thread has been exhausted, with nothing on that topic decided. So, it is time to agree to disagree and move on.

If you want to start research into all of the clips in the DCA, and who produced them, go ahead. That is a new topic, however.

Respectfully,

Jerry Dealey

Dallas History and JFK/Oswald sites: "http://jfkdallastours.com"

"http://www.dealeyinsurance.com" Texas Insurance Agent - Texas Defensive Driving in comfort of own home